西西里的美丽传说

出售Gigabyte RTX 2060微型显卡123：ITX单扇，3099元_我的网站

长发公主

A | 与每三叉五叉更新一次的整张图片相比，中国图片通常三年不开张，三年不吃东西。 CANBERRA, Australia -- Opposing campaigners made their final pitches on Friday over changing the Australia's constitution to acknowledge a place for Indigenous Australians on the eve of the nation's first referendum in a generation.The referendum has the potential to amend Australia’s founding legal document for the first time since 1977. But opinion polls suggest that the amendment will be rejected as more than four-in-five referendums have been in the past.Australians are being asked to alter the constitution to recognize the “First Peoples of Australia” by establishing an Indigenous Voice to Parliament.The committee comprised of and chosen by Indigenous Australians would advise the Parliament and government on issues that affect the nation’s most disadvantaged ethnic minority.Indigenous Australians account for only 3.8% of Australia’s population. But they die on average eight years younger than the wider population, have a suicide rate twice that of the national average and suffer from diseases in the remote Outback that have been eradicated from other wealthy countries.Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, a leading Voice advocate, cited the Israel-Hamas war to underscore why Australians should vote “yes” out of kindness toward the Indigenous population.“This week of all weeks where we see such trauma in the world, there is nothing — no cost — to Australians showing kindness, thinking with their heart as well as their head, when they enter the polling booth tomorrow and vote ‘yes,’” Albanese said.“Kindness costs nothing. Thinking of others costs nothing. This is a time where Australians have that opportunity to show the generosity of spirit that I see in the Australian character where at the worst of times we always see the best of the Australian character,” Albanese added.Opposition leader Peter Dutton, whose conservative party opposes the Voice, said polling showing declining support for the referendum over the past year was evidence Albanese failed to convince voters of the benefits of the Voice. “He’s instinctively won their hearts because Australians do want better outcomes for Indigenous Australians, but he hasn’t won their minds,” Dutton told Australian Broadcasting Corp.Indigenous activist Robbie Thorpe drew attention to Indigenous division over the Voice this week by applying for a High Court injunction to stop the referendum. “The referendum is an attack on Aboriginal Sovereignty,” Thorpe said in a statement on Friday.But the High Court said his writ had been rejected on Thursday on the grounds that it appeared to be an abuse of the court process, frivolous, vexatious or outside the court’s jurisdiction.Thorpe is among so-called progressive “no” campaigners who argue an Indigenous committee with no power of veto over legislation is not a sufficiently radical change.Many progressives argue the constitution should more importantly acknowledge that Indigenous Australians never ceded their land to British colonizers and a treaty was a higher priority than a Voice.Conservative “no” campaigners argue the Voice is too radical and the courts could interpret its powers in unpredictable ways.Some Indigenous people don’t have faith that the Voice’s membership would represent their diverse priorities.“Yes” campaigner Kyam Maher, an Indigenous man who is South Australia state’s attorney general, said the question he was most often asked by thousands of voters was what result Indigenous Australians wanted.“I can say absolutely and overwhelmingly Aboriginal people want their fellow Australians to vote ‘yes’ tomorrow,” Maher said.An opinion poll published this week supported Maher's view that a majority of Indigenous Australians wanted the Voice although that support had eroded since early 2023.Polling suggests the referendum will lose despite Australia’s peak legal, business, faith and sporting groups overwhelmingly supporting the Voice.Anne Twomey, a Sydney University constitutional law expert and a member of the Constitutional Expert Group that advised the government on drafting the referendum question, said she feared that Australian lawmakers might give up trying to change the constitution if the referendum fails.“I think it is a big concern if we end up with a constitution that’s frozen in time that we can’t change,” Twomey said.“In practice around the world, when a constitution becomes frozen and out of date with the world that it operates in, it becomes brittle and when there’s ever any stress on it, it does tend to break,” she added.___Follow AP's Asia-Pacific coverage at https://apnews.com/hub/asia-pacific。最近，瑞士透镜制造商nws instruments ag为长静音哈索V卡推出了两种新型消色差聚焦透镜-23mm apo f/3.5和110mm apo f/3.2。V卡是哈苏的经典系列。HASU503是V卡的成员。就在2014年CFV-50C数字5000万像素CMOS传感器发布之后，HASU还没有更新V卡系统。NWS Instruments AG推出了两个消色差聚焦透镜，为V卡增添了一点活力。根据NWS Instruments AG，两种新型消色差透镜23mm apo f/3.5和110mm apo f/3.2是为尺寸为44*33mm的CMOS传感器设计的。MTF50的分辨率在120lp/mm以上，分辨率很好。色差控制在10米以下，相当于50万像素上的两个横向像素范围。它们有15个孔径叶片和法兰。距离74.9mm，23mm APO F/3.5畸变4.8%，视角110度，图像场70mm。它在44*33mm传感器上有很大的轴移动空间。

B | 110mmapo f/3.2的畸变率为0.8%，图像场为55mm。换言之，摄影师可以在传统的中景相机上使用两个APO镜头，如645。然而，NWS Instruments AG的目标客户不仅是中帧相机，而且是全帧相机。

C | 为了充分发挥大图像场的优势，NWS Instruments AG还推出了一种称为Akrobat的轴移动轨迹，可以帮助用户更容易地实现镜头倾斜、上升/下降、移动和摆动。现阶段，NWS仪器股份有限公司尚未公布新镜片的价格和推出时间，但APO、大影像领域和中国画的几个主要卖点，恐怕价格不会低于3万元。